A February 2025 investigation by Mediapart, Africa Uncensored and Mongabay, conducted with Climate Whistleblowers, examined hundreds of contracts, reports and emails alongside field interviews, satellite imagery and open-source research. It alleged that some environmental consulting firms produced or supported biodiversity assessments that made destructive projects easier to finance or permit. The firms named included France’s Biotope and Britain’s The Biodiversity Consultancy; clients identified in the reporting included TotalEnergies, Eiffage, Rio Tinto and Chanel, with projects in Uganda, Mozambique, Guinea, Ivory Coast and Madagascar.
According to the investigation, reports often acknowledged ecological risks but proposed mitigation measures that communities and researchers considered inadequate or impractical. In some cases, implementation was reportedly subject to the project sponsor’s approval, weakening the independence of the audit process. The disclosures point to a structural conflict in a sector lacking strong independent oversight, but the source does not identify criminal convictions, regulator findings or a definitive court ruling. The allegations therefore remain contested rather than established fact.